Is the PC Desktop Dead?
A Look at the Future of Computing
Some people have declared that the desktop computer is finished.
They point out the huge increase in mobile computing, particularly tablets and smart phones while desktop PC sales have stagnated.
The Whole Story?
But does that tell the whole story?
I think several factors are at play in this scenario.
- Most people in North America that want a computer already have one (or several).
- The breakneck pace of PC development has slowed. The promises of new technologies like holographics and 3D printing are not yet mature.
- Portable devices like smart phones and tablets provide enough power for basic email, web surfing and social media.
- Internet access is found everywhere.
- Laptops are affordable and have sufficient capabilities to replace desktop computers.
- There is a conflict between the needs of the older keyboard/mouse users and those exploring the newer touch technologies.
Windows 8 Missed the Boat
Windows 8 was released at this point. People were still using Windows XP or 7 and had no compelling reason to upgrade since their computers could do all they needed them to do.
To top that off, Microsoft introduced an operating system that didn't suit traditional desktop computers — those using a mouse and keyboard.
Microsoft wanted Windows 8 to reflect the future of computing, but in achieving that goal it lost sight of the fact that the majority of Windows users are stuck in the here and now using budget hardware attached to keyboards and mice. — ZDNet
I believe Microsoft was more focused on their own ambitions than truly meeting the needs of their customers.
Tablet Technology Doesn't Sell Desktops
Microsoft miscalculated when it tried to capture the emerging portable device market (those used to swiping their tablets and phones rather than clicking their mouse) and ignored their traditional market (those using keyboard and mouse).
- Most Windows 8 computers didn't have a touch screen like tablets did.
- The touch desktop launched by default, instantly annoying all the folks comfortable with the traditional desktop.
- Veteran Windows users were asked to abandon all they had learned about how to operate a computer since Windows 3.1, when Windows became a household name.
A “Catastrophe” for Serious Gamers
Serious gamers want the latest and greatest and are willing to spend obscene amounts to get it. Gamers carried the PC industry for several years when PC sales slumped after the tech bubble burst in 2000.
Gabe Newell, managing directory of Valve (a videogame development and distribution company), stated:
I think Windows 8 is a catastrophe for everyone in the PC space. I think we'll lose some of the top-tier PC/OEMs, who will exit the market.
PC Sales Drop
The sales of both Windows 8 and desktop computers flatlined.
In December 2011, a month when tablets outsold that whole year's sales of standard PCs, only 10% of U.S. households owned a tablet. Remember, many households already owned more than one PC still capable of decent performance, allowing people to consider the luxury of a portable device.
Microsoft's response? Former Microsoft exec Ozzie stated, ‘Of course we're in a post-PC world’.
Could Something Else Be at Work?
Instead of providing true value and compelling reasons for users to upgrade their computers or purchase a new computer with the newest version of Windows, Microsoft was focusing on their corporate desire to gain a controlling share of the lucrative new phone and tablet market.
They gambled on their belief that folks were ready to move into a touch-only environment; ignoring the traditional keyboard and mouse desktop market. This came at a point where support for Windows XP was almost over, yet most folks were happy with that computing environment.
These combined as significant contributors to the decline in PC sales and Microsoft lost their bid to be a player in the mobile phone market.
[T]he PC isn't dead. What is dead is the old aggressive upgrade cycle that saw PCs being replaced every few years. Not only do people have more cool, shiny things to spend their money on – smartphones and tablets and the like — but also PCs have reached the point where they're powerful enough to last longer than ever. — ZDNet
Windows 7 the New XP?
Windows 7 was the last Windows version that truly provided the traditional desktop environment that folks had been using since the days of Windows 3.1 (1992–2001). As support for Windows XP expired, more moved to Windows 7 or moved to alternatives like Linux or the Mac while others stayed with XP in spite of increased security risks.
Many are now suggesting that Windows 7 will be as difficult for Microsoft to get people to move forward from as XP. Microsoft's offer of a free upgrade to Windows 10 for Windows 7 and 8.1 users was probably motivated as much by this fact as by their desire to move to supporting a single Windows environment.
Windows 10 is showcasing some incredible new technology like holographic computing, the Cortana digital assistant and some features of the Microsoft Edge browser.
Windows 10 provides a full desktop experience for traditional users (much like Windows 7) but allows those that have moved to Windows 8's touch interface to choose that format. The interface is a bit of a hybrid, with a restored Start menu combined with Windows 8 style tiles (a bit more configurable than in Windows 8.1).
It provides a full desktop experience for traditional users (much like Windows 7) but allows those that have moved to Windows 8's touch interface to choose that format. The interface is a bit of a hybrid, with the Start menu looking more like Windows 7's on the left with Windows 8 style tiles on the right side.
In spite of all this, the sales of new computers is projected to continue to decline even with the release of Windows 10.
Apple and Linux Emerge
Microsoft has dominated the PC since the earliest IBM PCs were licensed exclusively with Microsoft DOS (you could install something else but still had to pay for the Microsoft license with the purchase of the machine).
Microsoft's failing share of the market has allowed the Linux and Mac markets to grow. This is agravated by the increasing numbers that have abandoned the traditional “trade-up” every time Microsoft launches a new version of Windows.
So how do portable devices factor into the future of the desktop?
Portable Devices Trend Adjusting
With tablets and smart phones emerging as the new, more portable alternative, the debate has become more intense. Market penetration has increased rapidly. Indications a couple of years ago indicated that we're nearer to the start of the trend than into the mainstream.
More recently, manufacturers like Apple have faced slowing growth trends as the market of first-time tablet buyers shrinks.
Tablets Cost Less
Many user's budgets will determine that they can buy one or the other. If their current PC is working OK, the tablet provides a portable alternative for less than the cost of a replacement PC.
As such, [the Apple iPad] was an ideal purchase for those who'd been paring back for more than a year and a half and were looking for a modest indulgence. Most people equate the 1930s with bread lines, but the decade also saw sales double for a new gadget called the radio. — “Lesson of the iPad: In Tough Times, Treat Yourself,” Bloomberg BusinessWeek, October 15, 2012
Most Still Have a Functioning PC
Most of the folks buying a tablet or signing up for a smart phone already have a desktop that allows them to do their taxes, create and print documents, scan, surf the Web and more.
There is also the question of the full impact of ending support for Windows XP, the ubiquitous operating system that controlled three-quarters of the PC market at one point and still had 26.29% of the desktop operating system share at the end of April 2014 when Microsoft killed support (source).
The “Cloud” Enables Portable Computing
The emergence of cloud computing (see Moving into the “Cloud”) has made us less dependent upon local storage and has made our information available to us wherever we are — even when using smaller devices like smart phones and tablets.
The cloud needs to advance significantly before home users will find it easy enough to move to that platform without the readily-available tech support corporate users enjoy but we're well on our way into that journey.
The reliability of cloud-based systems is also untested.
- Cloud-based software is dependent upon the company providing the remote service (unlike traditional software installed on your own computer).
- The number, frequency and extent of reported (and unreported) privacy breaches (hacks) in the cloud makes it unattractive for sensitive or critical data.
- A 16 hour Outlook and Hotmail shutdown in March 2013 demonstrated the effects of a temporary disruption in service.
- When Google discontinued a number of their services the users dependent upon those services suddenly found themselves without options.
- The integration of Microsoft's Cloud storage service, SkyDrive, into Windows 8 was one of the significant vulnerabilities noted for Windows 8 by a Kaspersky product specialist.
Most Internet providers are also raising the price of extensive data usage, trying to shore up their declining profits in TV while facing threats like Netflix. Users may soon find it too pricey to continue to store everything online in spite of the convenience.
Security a Bigger Issue with Small Devices
Universal access also increases the potential for hacking and accidental loss of your critical data (most non-corporate users don't retain local backups when using the cloud).
Smart devices are smaller, portable and easier to misplace. When a smart phone is lost or stolen you could lose important personal data (or worse, corporate data).
Sure you can remotely wipe iPhones, iPads and other devices, but you'd lose anything prior to the last backup or sync. Users may be reluctant to take this step because of the cost of these devices.
California has passed a law requiring all new phones sold in the state to have remote wiping capability that would make them non-functional to remove their attractiveness for theft. That still doesn't account for the reluctance to quickly wipe irreplacable data.
The Corporate Market
Corporations can put their agents into the field with tablets largely because they are supported by well-developed computer networks to tie into.
Enterprise users indicated mixed prospects with only 24% even contemplating deploying Windows 8 during the early release days and most sticking with Windows 7. Windows 10 should fare somewhat better given the demise of Vista and the pending end of support of Windows 7.
The Personal Market
But what about the individual? Are the emerging systems sufficiently sophisticated to completely do away with traditional computers?
I've set up several clients with a simple tablet connected via a router and wireless printer. If all they are doing is email and surfing the Web, it is sufficient. They can still print documents and photos and the photographic capabilities are wonderful even compared to digital cameras on a few years older.
While fetching email, visiting Facebook and viewing photos works well on touch devices, more intensive applications like large spreadsheets, databases, image development, AutoCAD and similar programs are not so easily managed without a dedicated keyboard and mouse.
- Will the third-generation iPad finally replace your laptop?
- The Future of Mobile indicates we're just at the start of this conversion and have a long ways to go.
Can We Do Without Traditional PCs?
So, can we do without the desktop computer?
That depends upon what you're using the computer for.
PCs Lasting Longer
Personally, I don't read “the death of the PC” into the current trend towards tablets.
This technology offers portability but doesn't yet replace the power of a PC. Truly powerful portable devices an as-yet unfulfilled promise slowed down by high cost of both the higher-quality devices and cellular data as well as the relative clumsiness of on-screen keyboards.
It Depends Upon the User's Requirements
There's a big difference between posting on Facebook and creating a commercial document.
So the suitability of moving from a desktop (or laptop) computer to a tablet depends upon what your requirements are and how skilled you are with traditional and newer hardware.
Not everyone is willing or needs to continually upgrade their computer. That said, tablets have a relatively shorter lifespan since they cannot be upgraded (you're stuck with the technology you bought).
Casual Use & Social Networks Not As Demanding of Hardware
If you only access email and the Web you probably don't need a computer to do so (and certainly can't justify purchasing a more powerful one if you have a relatively recent model that does the job).
A tablet or smart phone will work just fine. Even if you can't afford the purchase price for a new computer you can still obtain a “free” smart phone — paying for the upgrade on a monthly basis.
Content Creators Need More Power
However, those creating serious content are going to need something more robust — at least for the majority of their work. A tablet or smart phone may provide a necessary convenience, but will not replace the computer for these users.
This may come in time as voice control improves and devices become more powerful, but we're not there yet.
As well, data plans for cellular networks are still far too expensive in Canada — it costs far more than home-based Internet does (and obscenely more than basic cable television) for similar bandwidth.
Tablets an Accessory for Power Users
I can't be as productive with a high-end laptop as I was when using a Windows 7 desktop that cost half what my laptop had.
In fact, I have a hard time visualizing how a desktop of large and distracting “live” icons will improve my productivity. Social media is not my main focus (and I don't use XBox) — I'm concentrating on creating content, not watching it.
I have a third-generation iPad and fifth-generation iPhone. The clarity of the iPad screen is breath-taking and there is a lot that I can do with it, but it certainly hasn't replaced my computer. This will likely be true for most power users for the foreseeable future.